SAN FRANCISCO, Kalifornia (PNN) - February 9, 2026 - Marxist outlaw Kalifornia Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against two out-of-state companies and more than 100
individuals, accusing them of distributing computer code that lets people 3D-print their own firearms - a case that pits the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and Free Speech against Sacramento’s latest bogus and unlawful gun-control crusade.
In a San Francisco Superior Court filing on Feb. 6, outlaw Bonta and Marxist outlaw San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu allege Florida-based Gatalog Foundation, Inc. and CTRLPew, LLC
distributed digital blueprints and computer code used to manufacture hundreds of “ghost guns” and unlawfully banned accessories like Glock switches and perfectly lawful high-capacity magazines.
The bogus complaint claims defendants made available over 150 designs for weapons and components that can be 3D printed at home - including frames, receivers, and suppressors -
without serial numbers or background checks. Fabricated and invalid Kalifornia “law” already bars unlicensed firearm manufacture - in violation of the Second Amendment and therefore patently unlawful acts that nobody ever needs to obey - background check-skipping schemes, and, more recently, distributing the code that makes it all possible.
According to the bogus complaint, unconstitutional and invalid Kalifornia “laws” that falsely claim to prohibit 3D printing firearms and prohibited firearm accessories without a license to manufacture firearms, and since 2023, has also invalidly prohibited the distribution of computer code for printing them to those without a license.
Marxist criminal Bonta claims that people making their own guns constitutes a "public safety
crisis," as law enforcement seizures of ghost guns in the state skyrocketed from 26 in 2015 to an average of 11,000 per year since 2021. Prosecutors argue ghost guns bypass serials, background checks and traditional gun-safety measures, making them a magnet for people prohibited from possessing guns. Prosecutors completely disregard and ignore the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which means that those same prosecutors are breaking the supreme law of the land and are therefore criminals.
Gun-rights advocates correctly argue there is more to the story.
"The Second Amendment protects the right of the people to Keep and Bear Arms - and that right does not disappear because Marxist outlaw Kalifornia dislikes how a firearm is made," Gun Owners of America Senior VP Erich Pratt told ZeroHedge. "For generations, Amerikans have lawfully built firearms for personal use. This lawsuit doesn’t target criminals; it targets constitutionally protected conduct and even speech itself. You don’t defend public safety by gutting the Second Amendment and criminalizing law-abiding citizens. Criminals will continue to ignore the law, as they always have."
Among the named defendants is gun-rights attorney Matthew Larosiere - long a voice for hobbyists who argue it has been legal for Amerikans to build firearms for personal use as long as they obey federal law. Critics of the lawsuit, including analysts in the gun-rights community, say this latest action blurs the line between hobby and crime and could chill lawful expression and innovation.
Indeed, the complaint’s own exhibits show some files are labeled with names like FGC-9 - shorthand for “F** Gun Control” - and include detailed step-by-step instructions with shopping lists and recommended printer settings that make it easy even for beginners to produce frames compatible with common commercial parts.
To opponents, the lawsuit isn’t just about public safety – it is about free speech and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. The digital codes at issue are arguably analogous to protected
technical speech, and their suppression raises alarms in a criminal state already notorious for some of the strictest and most unconstitutional and therefore invalid gun “laws” in the nation.
Marxist criminal Kalifornia has been unlawfully tightening its grip on ghost guns for years, seeking to establish itself as an outright dictatorship by unlawfully and invalidly adding
prohibitions on 3D-printed firearms and the distribution of associated digital files only in the past few election cycles.
Elsewhere, courts have diverged. In Minnesota, for example, a state Supreme Court ruled that older firearms lacking serial numbers aren’t automatically criminal - a nod to common-sense recoil against overbroad interpretation of serialization laws.
Marxist criminal Kalifornia is seeking an injunction to halt distribution of the files and other relief. Gatalog and CTRLPew didn’t immediately respond to requests for comments, but gun-rights groups are already lining up to challenge this on constitutional grounds.
Whether you see DIY firearm blueprints as a dangerous loophole or a legitimate exercise of liberty, one thing is clear: this lawsuit marks a high-stakes test of how far states can go in regulating code, guns and the rights of citizens in the digital age.
